By ecoRI News staff
If Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke’s recommendations to eliminate parts of existing national monuments are accepted by President Trump, some of the country’s pristine lands and waters will lose protection from timbering, mining, drilling and overfishing — a move that could lead to the destruction of treasured lands and marine ecosystems.
Such a move also would defy public opinion. Ninety-eight percent of the record-breaking 2.8 million public comments to the Interior Department asked the federal government to maintain or expand areas under protection.
The Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument, off the coasts of Massachusetts and Rhode Island, remains on the list of monuments under review by the Trump administration. The monument’s steep canyons and ancient volcanoes are home to a rich array of undersea life, including 73 species of coral. The area also provides critical habitat for many species of dolphins and endangered whales.
Without the protection of the Antiquities Act, this undisturbed underwater ecosystem would once again be exposed to threats from commercial fishing and fossil-fuel extraction, according to Environment America.
Losing protection would deprive future generations of a rich source of scientific knowledge and a natural wonder, said Kelsey Lamp, Oceans Fellow with Environment America.
“The Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument protects critical species, including the endangered sperm whale,” she said. “The unwise and unpopular choice to stop protecting America’s lands and waters will ravage pristine places, put wildlife in danger, and jeopardize scientific and archaeological history.”
The latter reason explains why most national monuments have been created under the Antiquities Act, signed into law by President Theodore Roosevelt in 1906.
“The Antiquities Act is the first law to establish that archaeological sites on public lands are important public resources. It obligates federal agencies that manage the public lands to preserve for present and future generations the historic, scientific, commemorative, and cultural values of the archaeological and historic sites and structures on these lands,” according to the National Park Service.
From Roosevelt to Obama, 16 American presidents, Democrats and Republicans, have used the Antiquities Act to protect more than 150 special places as national monuments. National monuments aren’t statues — they are federally owned lands and waters that have historic and/or scientific significance.
In an op-ed published by ecoRI News in June, Berl Hartman, a founding director of the New England Chapter of Environmental Entrepreneurs, wrote, “This ecologically rich ocean area, about 150 miles off Cape Cod, has five undersea canyons and four dramatic submarine mountains. It is habitat to more than 1,000 species, including endangered sperm whales and Atlantic puffins. It’s also replete with corals, some of which are more than a thousand years old and reach the height of small trees. Scientists who have investigated the area say these coral formations and marine species are unique and extraordinary to behold. They are straight out of Dr. Seuss.”
In April, President Trump ordered Zinke to review 27 of these national treasures. Legal scholars agree that the president doesn’t have authority under the Antiquities Act to significantly alter a national monument. The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 affirmed that only Congress can modify national monuments.
“Secretary Zinke’s recommendation foolishly elevates the fleeting value derived from extracting more resources from these special ecosystems, over the timeless value gained by preserving America's most precious places for our children, our grandchildren and generations to come,” Lamp said.